WordCamp Montreal 2010 (I’ll be there)

À la fin août, je vais faire une présentation à WordCamp Montréal 2010 (http://wordcampmontreal.org/)

wcmtl.jpg

WordPress for Non-profits: getting the word out on a shoestring budget

WordPress pour un organisme à but non lucratif: faire plus avec moins

Description: Toutes les organisations peuvent bénéficier de l’utilisation d’un blogue. Mais pour un organisme à but non lucratif (OBNL) c’est un choix incontournable aujourd’hui. Fort de nos expériences, qui incluent l’organisation d’une exposition réussie en 2009 et le lancement du premier musée de la micro-informatique en septembre, cette allocution explique comment un OBNL peut bénéficier de WP, de feuilles de styles adaptées et de certains plug-ins bien choisis,  pour obtenir une grande visibilité à peu de frais tout en mobilisant ses bénévoles et partenaires.

English: Any organization can benefit from using WordPress to build websites, but for non-profits it make a lot of sense. Informed by our experiences which include organizing an event and launching an IT museum in montreal using WP, this talk will look at how non-profits can use WordPress, customized templates  and some well-chosen plugins to achieve great results for minimal costs, including how to harness the enthusiasm of your volunteers and partners to make your site a success.

Nouveau cas de fraude à Montréal

Après Earl Jones et René Sauriol, un autre fraudeur à la Ponzi aurait frappé à Montréal. Selon le quotidien The Gazette, les présumées victimes seraient une centaine de petits investisseurs qui auraient injecté des millions de dollars dans une compagnie située à l’étranger.

L’avocat Jacob L. Rothman, qui représente certaines de ces présumées victimes, est monté aux barricades, cette semaine. Il soutient que l’Autorité des marchés financiers n’a pas protégé les investisseurs dans cette histoire.

Me Rothman indique que l’AMF aurait enquêté entre 15 et 20 mois sur Progressive Management Ltd, une société installée au Bahamas impliquée dans l’affaire sans toutefois porter des accusations.

Un des individus impliqués, Lance Townend, aurait déjà travaillé pour Triglobal Capital, selon les allégations de l’avocat. Deux conseillers inscrits auprès de l’AMF seraient nommés dans cette poursuite et, selon l’organisme de réglementation, aucune plainte n’aurait été formulée à leur endroit jusqu’ici.

Interrogée par The Gazette, Cathy Beauséjour de l’AMF, n’a pas souhaité commenter l’affaire en refusant également de confirmer ou d’infirmer qu’il y ait bel et bien eu enquête contre cette société.

La poursuite allègue qu’Anthony Riccio et Karen Dance auraient mis sur pied PML. Les deux individus seraient actuellement introuvables. Près de 100 investisseurs, principalement des gens d’âge moyen ayant investi des montants allant de 25 000$ à 150 000$, auraient été floué

Source: http://www.lesaffaires.com/article/0/services-financiers/2009-07-31/496452/nouveau-cas-de-fraude-etagrave-montreteacuteal.fr.html

Security risks of Web 2.0 tools should not be overlooked by enterprises, individuals

Like it or not, the use of Web 2.0 technology use in enterprises is here to stay. Even longstanding enterprise software providers, such as Salesforce.com, have created tools for integrating social networks into the customer support and lead generation process. And you’d be hard-pressed to find a Fortune 500 company that doesn’t, at the very least, have a corporate blog.

Over the last few weeks, two organizations issued study results focusing on the use of social networking within the enterprise. RSA Conference, in its “What Security Issues Are You Currently Facing?” report, surveyed nearly 150 C-level executives and professionals charged with directing, managing and engineering security infrastructures within their respective organizations.

Social networking and security was a consideration, however it appears that organizations thus far claim to have been minimally impacted by social network threats. According to the survey, 84 percent of respondents allow Twitter and Facebook in the enterprise, however only 3 percent were seriously affected by the recent Facebook and Twitter phishing attacks.

“The fact that only 3 percent of people surveyed said that their companies had been impacted shows how big the problem really is,” said Mike Murray, chief information security officer for Foreground Security. “The problem is that the security technology they have in place doesn’t allow them visibility into the threats. Current technologies are not looking for threats that take advantage of human weakness. It’s like having your hands over your eyes. It’s such a bad problem they can’t even see it.”

In another study, Frost & Sullivan issued its “Web 2.0 Tools: Consumer Technologies Entering the Enterprise World” report. The firm surveyed more than 1,400 Web 2.0 tools users who work fulltime within a U.S. organization. According to the report, there are many perceived risks of Web 2.0 tools in the enterprise, including fear over confidential information inadvertently being published, allowance of malware onto corporate networks, network bandwidth issues and loss of employee productivity. Respondents ranked social networks as the tool with the largest perceived risk, above blogs, wikis and team spaces. While to the users social networks presented the greatest risk, that risk is still perceived as only “moderate.”

The fact that both studies indicate a lukewarm concern toward Web 2.0 tools in the enterprise is alarming, and to Murray’s point shows that those surveyed may not understand the larger problem at hand. Earlier this year Kaspersky Labs issued a report stating that attacks through social networks are 10 times as effective as distributing malware through email. That Web 2.0 tools, including social networks, pose a larger security risk to individuals is a misconception. Any of these types of attacks could present serious ramifications for businesses.

Next: Methods to address the madness –>

Source: http://blogs.zdnet.com/feeds/?p=1423

UK Riot police raid private party posted on Facebook

Riot police raided a 30th birthday barbecue because they thought the organiser, who had invited his friends via Facebook, was staging a rave.

Four police cars, a riot van and a helicopter moved in on Andrew Poole’s gathering which was taking place in a field owned by a friend.

The coach driver had invited 17 guests to an ‘event’ on his social networking page by private invitation and was about to light the barbecue when the gazebo suddenly started flapping wildly and the sound of chopper blades filled the air.

A police helicopter circled the field several times before four police cars and a riot van stormed into the field in a small village near Sowton, Devon.

Eight officers wearing camouflage trousers and body armour then jumped out and ordered the party to be shut down or everyone would be arrested.

Andrew, of, Devon, said: ‘It had started to rain so we had gone in under the gazebo. All of a sudden there was this noise in the sky – I honestly couldn’t believe it.

‘The thing then hovered over us for about 25 minutes, watching 15 people eat. They told us to take down the sound system and said everybody’s got to leave.

‘It was 4pm and we hadn’t even plugged the music in yet. We tried to reason with them, and even offered for them to take the power lead for the sound system, but they were having none of it.

‘It was on private land. We were nowhere near anyone. We weren’t even playing any music. What effectively the police did was come in and stop fifteen people eating burgers.’

Andrew had spent £800 for the hire of the generator, marquee and food. The guests arrived at 3pm but soon after a police helicopter generated a huge dust cloud which covered his BBQ in debris.

Andrew said: ‘The police had full-on camouflage trousers on and body-armour, it was ridiculous. There was also several plain-clothes officers as well.

‘I told them it was my 30th birthday. I said « this is a once in a lifetime event for me, please don’t ruin it ». But they kept on insisting I had been advertising it as an all-night rave on the internet.

‘But I’d created an event, and 17 people had confirmed as guests, I did put the times on it as « overnight » in case people wanted to sleep-over.

‘They were still banging on saying it was advertised on the internet. They wouldn’t accept it wasn’t a rave. It was in a completely isolated field.

‘We’d actually faced the speakers away from the village just in case nosy-neighbour types complained. But someone must have seen us putting up the marquee and phoned the police.’

A spokeswoman for Devon and Cornwall police said the helicopter was deployed for less that 20 minutes at a cost of around £200.

She said local residents were concerned due to previous raves having reportedly taken place in the area with loud music and traffic disruption into the early hours.

She said: ‘The decision to close down a rave or illegal music festival is not taken lightly.

‘On this occasion, we were extremely concerned how the event had been advertised on the internet as an all-night party and it was therefore necessary to take the appropriate steps.

‘Had it gone ahead, it is likely that far more of our resources would have been used to police the event and there would have been considerable disruption to neighbouring properties.

‘It was fortunate that the force helicopter was able to fly over the site as they were returning from another task.’

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1200310/Police-raid-30th-birthday-barbecue-man-used-Facebook-invite-friends.html#ixzz0NCgOORRR

How To Violate Facebook Etiquette And Piss Off Your Friends

As Facebook becomes a center for our personal communication there is an etiquette that has become standard. Over the past few months I’ve been talking with people about their experience with Facebook and the more people I speak to, the more that I learn there are a number of best practices when using the site. After talking to a lot of people, I’ve noticed that I break the rules daily so hopefully you don’t make the same mistakes I have.

1. Update Your Status About Mundane Activities

It’s seriously great to know that you just pigged out on a half pound filet mignon but unless you are giving context to your experience, your friends probably don’t care. Status updates were not made to let your friends know about the fact that you are standing on an elevator, or even on a boat! If you’re going to take the time to enter your status, at least take the time to be a bit creative with it. While it may be cathartic to let people know about the horrendous service you just got, it really doesn’t provide much value, so just quit it!

2. Keep On Poking Away

What the hell is a poke? I think we all know what it means to poke people. You are trying to flirt but if you keep it up, it shifts from funny to annoying. When was the last time that something positive came out of walking up to someone in a bar and beginning to poke them until they responded? If you can successfully turn a poke into a lasting relationship then you are truly a master of manipulation because most people would find it flat out annoying.

On Facebook, poking wars can be fun at first but there’s an unspoken threshold that can be surpassed. Don’t surpass it if you don’t want to piss off your Facebook friends.

3. Sharing Your Quiz Results

It’s great to know that you are destined to be a “True New Yorker”, but do all of your friends really need to hear about it? There are thousands of entertaining quizzes on Facebook but keep the entertainment to yourself rather than share the insignificant results with your friends. While you may be good in bed, do you really need a quiz to tell you that? Also, do your friends really want to know about the most private details of your life as described through quiz results? Probably not.

4. Invite Your Friends To Some Sort Of Battle

There are tens of thousands of applications on Facebook and while there are plenty of games that are fun to play, not all of your friends are interested in joining you in a battle on Mafia Wars. Yeah, all those invites will quickly result in your friends removing you from their Facebook contacts. Don’t believe me? Keep on sending those Farm Town invites to all your friends and see what happens. Seriously, when you’re clicking on all your friends to invite them to the next game you are playing because you think it will boost your score. The only thing your going to end up accomplishing is annoying the hell out of your friends.

5. Reply To Broadcast Messages

You’ve seen it before: one of your friends sends out a broadcast message to update their friends about an event and then suddenly a threaded conversation erupts. We know that you’ve probably been too busy to catch up with many of your friends recently but don’t take mass messages as the opportunity to reconnect. You’re flooding everybody’s inbox with information that isn’t relevant to them and it’s flat out annoying!

6. Tag Your Friends In Unattractive Photos

Not everybody can look attractive from every angle but that doesn’t mean you should take this opportunity to highlight the angle that doesn’t work. Even worse is that you continue to tag everybody else that’s in the unattractive photo so that it can be circulated among all our friends. If you want to quickly damage your relationship, go find the most unattractive photo of your friend and tag them in it. Don’t be surprised when you end up unfriended for doing it!

7. Friend People Who Hated You In High School

While this one isn’t going to damage your existing relationships, it’s just bad form. Remember those people that you hated back in high school? They were part of the inspiration behind becoming successful yet for some reason they now want to reconnect years later. Personally, I don’t really mind since I don’t have any unforgivable experiences but most people are not going to friend you after you put them through years of torture. If you were a jerk, don’t expect to become mister (or miss) popular now that we’ve all grown up.

Source: http://www.allfacebook.com/2009/07/facebook-friend-etiquette-2/